Skip to main content
Inclusion Tracker

What the words mean

Written for governors, business managers and anyone else new to the framework — the language should never be the barrier.

The five levels

1 · Emerging
The work has not really begun, or exists only in pockets. Nothing to be ashamed of — every school is Emerging at something, and saying so is the point of an honest self-evaluation.
2 · Developing
Something real is happening, but it depends on particular people or isn't consistent across the school yet.
3 · Established
There is a defined approach and it is actually implemented — a new member of staff would find it, not just hear about it. This is the level the DfE expects a strategy to be building towards.
4 · Embedded
Consistent practice across the school, checked and quality-assured. A rating of 4 or 5 is a claim: it needs current evidence (from the last 18 months) and a named owner before it counts as supported.
5 · Leading Practice
Sustained, evidenced excellence that other schools could learn from. Rare by design — most schools have none or one of these, and that is normal.

Scores and bands

Principle score
The average of a principle's statement ratings, shown once at least 5 of its 6 statements are answered. Fewer than 5 and we show progress instead of a score, because an average of two answers would be a guess dressed as a number.
Whole-school maturity
The average of all 7 principle scores, shown only when all 7 are valid. One number can never tell the whole story, which is why it always appears beside the seven principle scores, never alone.
Provisional
A score marked provisional contains ratings of 4 or 5 that don't yet have the evidence and named owner to back them. The score stands, but it is flagged as not yet fully supported.
The no-compensation rule
A school cannot show as Leading Practice overall while any principle is below Established. Excellence in 5 areas does not offset real gaps in 2 — inclusion is experienced by children one gap at a time.

Voice

Belonging, participation, access
The three things the surveys measure, because they are what inclusion feels like from a child's side: do I belong here, can I join in, can I get at the learning.
Positive %
The share of answers in the top half of the scale — 'Mostly' and 'Always' for pupils, 'Agree' and 'Strongly agree' for parents and staff. The staff survey has a neutral middle point, so 50% positive does not mean 50% negative.
Suppression
With fewer than 5 responses, nothing is shown at all — in a small group, a number can identify a child. From 5 we show outcome scores rounded to 10%; from 10, every question rounded to 5%; written comments only appear from 15 responses. This is enforced in the database, not just the screen.

The strategy

Barrier
Something the self-evaluation showed is getting in the way of children learning or taking part — drafted automatically from any statement rated 1 or 2, in the school's own evidence.
Budgeted cost
The DfE requires every activity in a published strategy to carry the money attached to it. The pre-publication checklist will not let a strategy publish without this.
Publication record
The public fact of publishing: the date, the link, and when the annual review falls due. This — and only this — is what your local authority sees automatically. Never the strategy's working, evidence or survey results.
Focus priority
Your three lowest-scoring principles, flagged in the strategy and on the dashboard. The same three in both places, so there is never two answers to 'where do we act first?'.

Support in school

Graduated response
The assess → plan → do → review cycle used when a child needs more than the universal offer: understand the need, plan support, do it, then check honestly whether it worked.
Universal, Targeted, Targeted Plus
Three levels of provision: what every child gets (Universal), extra help for some (Targeted), and intensive personalised support for a few (Targeted Plus). A needs-led school decides by need, not by diagnosis or label.
Reasonable adjustments
Changes a school makes so a disabled child is not at a disadvantage — a legal duty under the Equality Act 2010, not a favour.